The presidency of Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. remains one of the most polarizing chapters in modern Philippine politics. While his supporters praise his leadership, millions of Filipinos harbor deep resentment toward his administration. Here’s why—and what makes his loyal base stand by him despite the controversies.
The legacy of the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos Sr. continues to cast a long shadow over Philippine politics, with his son, Bongbong Marcos, at the center of the controversy. The Marcos regime, which spanned 21 years from 1965 to 1986, was marred by martial law, human rights abuses, corruption, and allegations of ill-gotten wealth. For many Filipinos, especially victims and their families, the wounds of that dark period in history remain raw and unhealed.
 |
| Photo Council on foreign relation |
Under Ferdinand Marcos Sr.'s rule, thousands of individuals faced torture, extrajudicial killings, or enforced disappearances, leaving scars that endure to this day. The Marcos family's alleged plunder of billions of dollars from the nation's coffers serves as a painful reminder of a time rife with corruption and impunity. It is no wonder that for many Filipinos, trust in the Marcos name remains elusive, as the specter of past atrocities looms large over the present.
READ MORE ARTICLE:
Pope Francis’ Near-Death Crisis: Doctor Reveals Harrowing Decision to "Let Him Go or Push Forward"
Women Leaders Rise: DOJ Undersecretary, ARTA Director, and QC Prosecutor Commissioned as AFP Reserve Lieutenant Colonels
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth Under Fire Over Leaked Attack Plans
One of the key issues that compounds this distrust is the prevalence of political dynasties in Philippine politics, with the Marcos family serving as a prominent example. The perpetuation of elite families in positions of power is seen as a threat to democratic principles, undermining meritocracy and fostering a culture of entitlement. Critics argue that Bongbong Marcos's ascent to political prominence is emblematic of a system that prioritizes privilege over capability, further eroding public faith in the political establishment.
The convergence of historical trauma from the martial law era and the fatigue induced by entrenched political dynasties creates a challenging environment for reconciliation and progress in the Philippines. The struggle to reckon with a dark past while confronting the realities of contemporary governance underscores the complexity of the nation's political landscape.
As the Philippines grapples with these enduring legacies, the call for accountability, transparency, and genuine democratic renewal grows louder. The narrative of the Marcos family and their role in Philippine society serves as a poignant reminder of the need for vigilant citizenship, responsible leadership, and a commitment to justice and integrity in governance. Only through reckoning with the shadows of the past can the Philippines hope to forge a future grounded in democratic values and inclusive progress.
President Marcos finds himself embroiled in a web of controversy and public outrage, stemming from a series of betrayals, resignations, and political upheavals that have shaken the nation to its core.
The rift between President Marcos and Vice President Sara Duterte, once united in a historic election victory that garnered 32+ millions of votes across Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao, has deepened into a bitter feud. The Vice President's resignation from the Department of Education, citing political attacks and internal corruption attacks, laid bare the fissures within the administration. Sarah Duterte's exposé on budget mismanagement implicating key figures like Martin Romuldez and Elizaldy Co has further fueled the flames of discord, with both sides vehemently defending their positions amidst mounting public scrutiny.
The House of Representatives, reflecting the growing discontent among lawmakers, passed a resolution for impeachment with a resounding majority of 215 out of 306 members, signaling a decisive shift in political tides. The impending trial in the Senate looms large, casting a shadow of uncertainty over President Marcos's future in office.
Amidst the political turmoil, allegations of illegal arrests of International Criminal Court (ICC) officials—with the help of Philippine government agencies—to arrest Rodrigo Duterte have added fuel to the fire. Malacañang's tepid response to the ICC's request to freeze Duterte's assets has only intensified public skepticism and calls for accountability.
Adding to the administration's woes are accusations of disinformation and historical revisionism, with pro-Marcos networks accused of whitewashing the brutalities of martial law. Historians, activists, and survivors have raised alarm over the erosion of truth and memory, fearing a dangerous rewriting of history for political expediency.
Economic woes further compound President Marcos's challenges, as high inflation erodes purchasing power, poverty rates persist unabated, and job opportunities remain scarce. Controversial foreign policies, crackdowns on dissent, and a lack of transparency in governance have sowed seeds of distrust among the populace, eroding the once-promising hopes for prosperity and progress.
In this climate of uncertainty, with public sentiment turning increasingly hostile towards President Marcos, the future of the nation hangs in the balance. As the political landscape shifts and tensions escalate, the resilience of democracy and the will of the Filipino people to demand accountability and justice will shape the course of the nation's destiny.
Calls for President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr.'s resignation are growing louder as Filipinos express their fear and disappointment over the alleged drug use of the president. Despite mounting pressure, Marcos Jr. and his family have refused to undergo drug tests, a demand echoed by a significant portion of the population.
The lack of action from the President and his family has fueled public skepticism and distrust, particularly in a country grappling with a rampant drug problem. The Philippines has a long history of drug-related violence, with countless innocent lives lost and widespread fear among citizens. Many Filipinos feel that the administration's inaction on this issue is a betrayal of their trust.
Adding to the public's frustration is the country's soaring cost of living. The Philippines now boasts one of the highest costs of living in Southeast Asia, coupled with low wages. The issue of rice, a staple food for Filipinos, remains a constant struggle as many struggle to afford enough to eat.
The combination of these issues has left many Filipinos feeling disillusioned and desperate for change. The future of the Marcos Jr. administration remains uncertain as public discontent continues to rise.
The Philippines remains sharply split over Bongbong Marcos. For critics, he represents a return to dictatorship and corruption. For supporters, he is the best hope for progress.
As economic pressures mount and political tensions rise, the debate over his legacy will only intensify. One thing is clear: The ghost of the Marcos past still haunts the Philippines’ future.
What’s your take? Is Marcos leading the country forward—or dragging it back? Let us know in the comments.
